Video timeframe of 1:21. The last book in the Bible is the book of Revelation. Revelation = 121
California regulators want to tax text messages to increase funds for programs that bring connectivity to underserved residents.
A new surcharge proposed by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) wouldn't be a per-text tax, but a monthly fee based a cellular bill that includes any fees for text-message services. Most carriers offer a flat fee option for texting, and already charge a similar fee for other services included in the bill — such as phone calls. The exact structure of the charge would vary from carrier to carrier.
Wonder why they used this particular YouTube personality to promote this nonsense? Her full name sums to 22.
Anna Kay Akana is an American actress, filmmaker, author, and comedian. She is known for her YouTube channel, which has over 2 million subscribers and over 226 million video views.
Anna Akana's full name is Anna Kay Akana.
I didn't think I would be decoding a YouTube actress/personality today but in relation to this article, from her birthday (8/18/18) to the date of this article proposing a tax to text messages (12/12/18) is exactly 117 days.
Did she say she lost her little sister at the age of 17? kind of similar to 117?
The commission will vote on the measure January 10, 2019, and is facing strong opposition from industry trade groups like the CTIA, which represents AT&T Mobility, Sprint, and T-Mobile. (AT&T is the parent company of CNN.)
From today's date of this article mentioning the proposal for a plan to tax text messages (12/12/18) to the day the vote will take place on the measure (1/10/19) is a span of 29 days.
It is also 4 weeks and 1 day away, like 41. 41 is the 13th prime. L.A. = 13 / 41
Does that say the proposal was a '52' pages?
52 is the reflection of 25
The videotime frame reads 00:25
https://ktla.com/2018/12/12/california-regulators-consider-fees-to-send-text-messages-on-cellphones/
California regulators are considering a plan to charge a fee for text messaging on mobile phones to help support programs that make phone service accessible to the poor, according to a newspaper report Wednesday.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC or PUC) is a regulatory agency that regulates privately owned public utilities in the state of California, including electric power, telecommunications, natural gas and water companies. In addition, the CPUC regulates common carriers, including household goods movers, passenger transportation companies such as limousine services, and rail crossing safety.
CTIA is a trade association representing the wireless communications industry in the United States. The association was established in 1984 and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. It is a 501(c)(6) nonprofit membership organization, and represents wireless carriers and suppliers, and manufacturers and providers of wireless products and services.
CTIA operates certification programs for the wireless industry and publishes wireless industry surveys.
The 52-page proposal was submitted by CPUC Commissioner Carla J. Peterman.
Commissioner Carla J. Peterman name gematria
On the local broadcasts, the alphabet news agencies spoke on this proposal in order to help the homeless.
This reliable CNN article makes no mention of assisting the homeless whatsoever.
Then I hear about this proposal not helping the homeless exactly per say but rather low-income families, another change.
Since when did 'underserved residents' turn into a suicide hotline? This bogus backwards article provided by your mainstream, CNN, is yet another feeble attempt to further tax (steal); no promise that the money raised will be appropriated to the publicized cause, more so if anything another attempt to fleece money from the unsuspecting public.
No mention of the $1 billion funding from the previous year.
The CTIA argued in a legal filing submitted Wednesday that if texts are an information service, then the CPUC doesn't have authority over them and can't add on surcharges. It claims the proposal would go against federal law.
https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ctia-comments-before-the-california-puc-re-sms-surcharge-proposed-decision.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment