Microwave ovens are of the same frequency as the mobile phone. The difference between them is power. The power of a microwave oven is a thousand watts, power that can heat up a cup of water in about maybe 60 seconds.
The mobile phone, the cordless phone, the Wi-Fi monitor, the baby monitor and so on etc., they all use the same frequency, merely differing in power. They also differ because mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices emit PULSED MICROWAVE RADIATION. It’s the PULSE, NOT the power that appears to be biologically most important. The pulse that is erratic and irregular, for thousands of minutes a month for dozens of hours a week over a lifetime that erratic and irregular puled signal.
The continuous wave signals have alto of therapeutic effects as are being applied in medicine today.
The impact of any form of radiation depends on the nature of the waves:
1) Frequency
2) Amplitude
3) Pulse
4) Wavelength / Form
5 Information
Research supported by the American Cancer Society and carried out at Yale shows that genetic factors, such as single nucleotide snips make a difference in whether or not people are more or less susceptible to certain environmental exposures, in particular cell phone radiation.
Very seldom will you hear any clarification regarding Radioactive Electromagnetic Frequencies, like that of a cell phone. Such questions that should be asked are:
Was the signal continuous? Was it disruptive?
Was the signal altered in any way?
What was the power density?
What aspects of exposure were controlled?
In terms of power density, which is measured in volts per meter (y-axis), you see that through a four second phone call, you get these really huge swings in power density over time. It is thought that the constant change in peak exposure is what makes the biological impact. So it is not the power but the pulse. As Dr. Cindy Russell has said, “pulse is poison”.
A 4-second phone call example
1) Stand-by : phone is always sending pulsed signals
2) When sending / receiving a phone call, the power increases.
3) The phone by default is set to max power / intensity (which is when / why it is most dangerous to answer)
4) From then on the erratic / irregular pulsed electromagnetic frequencies vary.
There was a widely distribute paper by Ken Foster and CK Cho, that said that ‘the exposure of an adult and the exposure of a child is identical. Therefore, there is no real difference in how the radiation might be affecting them.’
This is a false statement whereas, even if a mother and a child, with different skin pigmentation / hair color / eye color etc., were to apply sunscreen, they would still get a different dose of ultraviolet light, even though they have the same exposure. The exposure may be uniform but the amount they will absorb differs because of the properties of the skin, the properties of the eye, the thinness of the skin and a number of other variables, and those same things are relevant when it comes to thinking about cell phone radiation.
The standards used to test phones today are the same standards that were used in 1996.
*Also, mobile cellular phones emit the most power when first initially answering the phone! Be careful!
The amount of exposure is quite similar among young adolescents and adults but because the head of the younger are smaller, they will absorb proportionally more.
This is a microwave radiation model of a six-year-old with greater levels to the frontal and temporal lobes, eyes and cheeks. The red, yellow and white reflect the hottest radiation levels. The radiation is going into the eyes, nose, mouth, ears and many other parts of the head.
When the mobile cellular device is placed inside a pocket, the reproductive organs, gonads and testicles as an example, as well as the bone marrow is radiated with this electromagnetic frequency.
The United States Conssumer Reports recommended that nobody keep a phone in their pocket. In fact, if the phones were tested in the pockets, they would exceed as-tested exposure guidelines.
Working with Yale University along with more than a hundred physicians and experts in the United States and around the world who specialize in pregnancy, this is a modeling of exposure to the head. At the end of pregnancy, the head more often than not is closest to the front of the belly of the mother, thus being the greatest exposure because the skin is completely permeable to radiation exposure. This is why it is advised that pregnant women protect their abdomens from mobile phone radiation as well as from other Wi-Fi, radiation electromagnetic frequencies.
The reason tablets are called tablets are because they were originally intended to be placed onto a tabletop 20 centimeters away. They are not approved to be held in the laps of young children! If those in positions of power truly knew the consequences of such technology, they would not be giving little children a two-way microwave radiating device
This is what the radiation emission looks like after six minutes of a phone call. That is not as bad as it looks because the red area only partway through the eyes.
This is a three-year-old depiction of mobile cell phone radiation after six minutes of a phone call the peak radiation colors, yellow. By the end of that six minute call, the peak radiation yellow and red is getting almost into both eyes.
This is just on call. It’s not going to kill anybody. It may not cause any biological effect.
EMFs may or may not cause radiation whatsoever after one call, or two calls, or three calls but the question is what is the cumulative impact of this kind of exposure? How do we evaluate and study it?
The problem we face right now is that we are in the midst of an experiment, including your children and grandchildren. And we don’t have anybody to compare with. We don’t have a control group. In science when you are given a drug, the study is conducted where some people get the drug and some people don’t get the drug, they are referred to as the ‘control’ group. You then see whether or not those who got the drug are healthier than those who did not. When you get results, you can conclude if there is a difference between the exposed and the control group that you drug has worked. When it comes to mobile phone radiation, we’ve lost our ability to have a true control group, even now with young children.
NATO for years has supported research on radar. Radar gave birth to microwave oven. The first microwave oven was called radar range. People figured out that they could cook thing switch radar and they thought it was pretty cool. The way it was discovered was that men would be standing on the deck and it was cold at night. They would warm themselves in front of the radar and if they ha chocolate in their pocket, it would melt. So that’s how they decided to figure out what would happen if you beamed radar at things like hot dogs and corn and so on. Soon enough that gave birth to the radar range.
Women didn’t like the thought of cooking with radar. Men on the other-hand thought it was pretty cool. Thus it was given a new name: microwave. It sounded dainty and more palatable. Nowadays, a microwave oven is a staple around the world.
Radar ranges were first introduced I the middle of the 20th century
Prenatal exposure of 900 MHz EMF induces pyramidal cell loss in the hippocampus of newborn rats.
A) Vitality of sperm (a measure of how well the sperm swim)
B) Mobility of sperm
C) Mitochondrial damage (3x damage if exposed to mobile phone radiation)
D) MSR Positive sperm (MitoSOX Red : Molecular probes)
Males:
Reported heavier cell phone users have reduced sperm count
Men who keep their mobile phones in their pockets have the lowest sperm count. There are many other studies with similar results.
It’s interesting that the research on this male fertility issue comes from people who are experts in male fertility, who started to treat men at infertility clinics and noticed that this was a major contributor to their fertility problems.
Experimental studies have been done also in India to confirm this kind of damage, not just looking at prenatal exposure or early early life exposure but taking middle aged rats, 70 day old male rats, exposing them to computer-generated mobile cellphone radiation signal for 2 hours a day for 45 days.
Damaged
testes after cell phone exposure.
Damage
to the Mitochondrial superoxides (top right hand corner)
(White bars represent the control whereas the black bars represent the RF-EMR, or Radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation)
(White bars represent the control whereas the black bars represent the RF-EMR, or Radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation)
Mitochondria is the engine of the cell.
If the motility of the the sperm is damaged, they cannot swim / move, make their way to fertilize with an egg.
Prenatal
exposure of cellphone radiation to animals clearly causes a downsizing and
deterioration of brain cells.
The head may absorb the same amount but the brain of the child contains more
fluid and can absorb more exposure, also in relation to the overall size of the head.
After 50 minutes of exposure from a mobile cellphone emiting radioactive electromagnetic frequencies, there was more "glucose" found in the brain. Make of that what you will.
***While radioactive electromagnetic frequencies, Wi-Fi, 3G, 4G, 5G etc. show permeable, deconstructing, harmful effects to living tissue, Melatonin and Omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to REVERSE this process.***
Females:
The female breast is mostly fat and fluid. Things that contain fat and fluid cook faster in the microwave oven. Mobile phones do not cook anything. They do not make any heat that we know of, but they do go through things that contain fat and fluid.
A 34 year old, avid runner Chinese-American woman who used her cell phone 4 hours a day in her bra for 10 years while driving is shown here. Since she was traveling, the mobile phone is pinging the tower to tower and it’s going to say “Here I am. Where are you? Here I am. Where are you? Here I am. Where are you?”
The tumors that developed, developed right under the antenna of the phone.
A very brave young woman named Tiffany France, when 21, now 22, developed metastatic breast cancer.
The top right hand portion displays the metastases into her chest wall. It was subcutaneous, right under the surface of the skin. Most breast cancer occurs in women over 50, occurring in the upper outer quadrant.
Negative for BRCA ½ - NO known genetic risks.
No family history or other risk factors.
Multi-focal tumors (more than one tumor) occur directly under phone antennas with mix of tubular / solid patterns of identical nuclear morphology & grade.
No significant histology in ductal and lobular units away from the areas of cellular phone use.
Two with metastases at young ages.
The environmental health trust, the organization that Dr. Devra Davis heads, published an article in 2013 saying that they think that mobile phone radiation is a probable human carcinogen.
The above image shows the developing rates of brain cancer with more than 1640 + hours of lifetime use of a phone, is almost 3x higher compared to people who did not use mobile phones.
If people started to use phones regularly before the age of 20, as most of the world is doing now, there is a 4 – 8 times more brain cancer after they had reached past ten years.
A cell phone user in these studies is someone who makes one call a week for six months. That’s it.
Minimise exposure!:
Safe practice tips:
The effects of radiofrequency along with other electromagnetic frequencies display a consistent result of having a significant role in cellular dysfunction, de-construction and many other harmful effects / influences on the biological cell, especially that of Voltage-gated Calcium channels (VGCCs) which in turn eventually lead to unfavorable effects / ailments within the human body such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia and many more.
In combination with other types of practices, some of which I conveniently omit, I've been making more of an effort to disconnect away from my phone, as if I haven't already enough. I can actually feel the EMF emissions after leaving my phone in my pocket for mere seconds now, feels like that of when your leg is numb and then you pinch it really hard or some other physically intense sensation.
Dr. Devra Davis covers radiofrequency-electromagnetic frequencies, Wi-Fi, cellular mobile devices along with many others. You may look up her research by simply typing in her name into a search engine, or YouTube if you'd like. There are many other sources as well.
Please educate yourself with Dr. Devra Davis' research,
current source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY
No comments:
Post a Comment